Gay Humanists’ Submission on Sex Offences Review
The Gay and Lesbian Humanist Association (GALHA) has been making submissions to government bodies on gay issues since its inception twenty years ago and its latest is to the Home Office Sex Offences Review Team.
In its submission, GALHA points out that a pluralistic, democratic society should not attempt to impose any particular religious or other moral codes on its citizens as a whole: the common law offences of conspiracy to corrupt public morals and to outrage public decency should be abolished. Terms such as ‘immoral’, ‘unnatural’, or ‘indecent’ have no place in the legal codes of a modern society and should be deleted from both statute and common law.
The submission further recommends that all victimless offences be abolished: “The law should defend people from unwanted sexual exploitation by others, but not attempt to protect people from themselves. In particular, the crime of ‘gross indecency’ should be abolished: anything deserving legal prohibition is covered under other provisions.”
GALHA points out that it does not regard any of the participants in sado-masochistic sex as victims. Sado-masochistic sex is sex, not violence, and should be considered as part of the review.
“Sexual activities”, says the submission, “have two distinct roles: for reproduction and for recreation. Many of the defects of our laws arise from treating the first as ‘good’ and the second as ‘bad’, whereas they both have positive values in appropriate contexts. There is no overwhelming social case to exercise different controls over sex than over swimming or mountaineering.”
On the age of consent, the submission says it is “a ham-fisted way of protecting children who are at risk from abuse and exploitation. The review team should be considering how it can best devise and recommend the substitution of more direct ways of providing such protection in all cases in which there is no genuine consent.”
Regarding proof of offence to third parties, the submission says that many GALHA members “are more offended by hearing out-of-tune buskers or by seeing public marches in support of racist policies than by a public display of sexual affection, either heterosexual or homosexual.”
The full text of GALHA’s submission can be found on its website.
In this section
- Reasons to be thankful this Christmas
- Speaking out about homophobia in other cultures
- Oh dear me, what could the matter be? The Catholic Herald fumes at diversity.
- Gay Campaigner Strudwick Calls For End To Abusive "Conversion" Therapy
- Why Secularism is Vital for Gay Rights
- End of GALHA Pride Stall season
- 2011 archive
- 2010 archive
- 2009 archive
- 2008 archive
- 2007 archive
- 2006 archive
- 2005 archive
- 2004 archive
- 2003 archive
- 2002 archive
- 2001 archive
- 2000 archive
- 1999 archive
- Never Forget
- Health Education Report a Danger to Gays
- GALHA Slams Labour over Gays in Armed Forces
- Humanists Want Bishops Banned
- Born of Mary
- Gay Humanists Jubilant as Pat Robertson resigns from Laura Ashley
- Gay Humanists Renew Call to Target Laura Ashley
- Alarm Bells Ring over Christian Radio Station
- GALHA Repeats Call to Protect Gays
- Age-of-Consent Debacle
- Humanists Boycott Bank of Scotland
- Gay Humanists’ Submission on Sex Offences Review
- Gay Humanists Lobby Home Secretary
- Gay Humanists Back Tinky Winky
- Humanists Pledge Support for Gay Rights
- GALHA Supports Age of Consent Campaign
- 1998 archive

